Author Archives: James Boehm

News Report: Stones River’s Banks Are Swelling with New Members While Tagdu Uses the Media to “Hup- Up!

News Report: Stones River’s Banks Are Swelling with New Members While Tagdu Uses the Media to “Hup- Up!

By James Boehm

From the editor: These days James Boehm wears numerous hats. First of all, he is the secretary of our Tennessee affiliate; next, he is the president of the Stones River Chapter; and finally, he is the president of the Tennessee Association of Guide Dog Users. Here is the James Boehm update.

The writer Arnold H. Glasgow once said, “Make life a mission, not an intermission.” Our NFB chapters and division in Middle Tennessee have been on a “mission” lately! How? By spreading the word about equality, reaching out to visually impaired students, and fighting for the rights of service dog users, to name a few.

Stones River, a predominantly student driven chapter of Murfreesboro, has been on “a mission!” The zeal and active participation by its members has drawn the attention of students and the community in the Murfreesboro area. Stones River is also sporting a new look! Four of its five, newly elected board members have been part of the chapter for less than 6 months! Further, the membership of Stones River has doubled in the past 3 months! How exciting! Our chapter meetings have included NFB trivia with gift card prizes, the establishment of Stones River Facebook and Twitter pages, and the organization of new committees. Various guests have been impressed by our positive atmosphere and welcoming spirit! Stones River will soon become a recognized student organization, which will open doors in building our chapter and make a difference in our community.

Many fundraising and community outreach projects are in the works. The Broad Street Chili’s restaurant in Murfreesboro sponsored a fundraiser on Memorial Day that provided many opportunities to bring awareness of our chapter and educate the community about the NFB. The Chili’s manager and staff expressed sincere appreciation and support from their establishment.

Stones River’s success is not by accident! Exemplary mentors and energetic members drive the growth and unity in Murfreesboro. I would like to thank all of Stones River’s members for their support, leadership, and fine example, modeling what being part of an NFB chapter is all about!

Stone’s River of Murfreesboro is not the only group in Middle Tennessee on a “mission.” In January 2014, The Tennessee Association of Guide Dog Users, or TAGDU, was formed and has flourished to become a strong affiliate of the NFB. As a proud division of The National Association of Guide Dog Users, TAGDU’s 25 members have, as a united front, worked vigorously in order to make a difference in Tennessee! How so?

In March 2014, James Brown and I were featured in a well-written article by the Tennessean about guide dogs and the newly implemented access laws; the article was picked up by other papers nationally, including USA Today, The Commercial Appeal, and other community newspapers. During this same period, TAGDU was contacted by a gentleman named George from Athens, Tennessee. George was distraught by policies established by his county’s school system that discriminated against guide dog users. TAGDU’s public relations director, Katherine Womack, as well as many other members of TAGDU, spent countless hours writing and contacting key individuals within the system, advocating for service dog users. These school officials, DLAC, and the TN School Board Association gave TAGDU the cold-shoulder, and were unwilling to further discuss these policies. Research exposed other school systems in Tennessee with policies that must be updated. Did TAGDU lose its fire due to the lack of support? No! After providing McMinn County, the School Board Association, and Blount County a reasonable time to respond, TAGDU decided action was needed. TAGDU began a vigorous press release that was shared with many media entities. To date, Channel 6 of Knoxville and the Sentinel of Knoxville have exposed the outdated guide dog policies and discrimination as top stories in their broadcasts and newspaper. As a result, both McMinn County and Blount County schools have stated that their policies will be amended in order to comply with state and federal ADA laws. It’s great to see how the persistence of a united, strong division can make! Be sure to check out the links at the end of this writing to see these recently published articles.

What future “missions” await TAGDU? We will continue to access various media tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and com

Advertisements

The Flame of Equality

The Flame of Equality
by James Boehm

The disabled have fought an uphill battle in demanding equality of all. Many blind organizations, such as the National Federation of the Blind, endeavor to educate the public regarding the abilities of the visually impaired, squashing all inaccurate misconceptions that are stereotyped. A thriving front of assistive technology experts are an intricate part in the mix of training and equipping the disabled. In 2014, in a time where we may feel that our world is a modernized society, the views many still have on the disabled gives the world the appearance that we are back in the Stone Age, a reverted thinking of inequality, slavery, poor expectations and the perceived inabilities of the “challenged!” A film entitled “A Little History Worth Knowing” exposes the actions of many nations, including the United States, in not only discriminating, but also attempting to extinguish the disabled, putting them out like a minute flame on a Bic lighter. Powerful persons, such as Hitler, attempted through eugenics, to weed out the supposedly weak or disabled, as a strand of crabgrass who holds such thoughts, thus disabling their own selves cognitively.
Assistive technology experts strive to keep the pace with the advances of assistive technology. Bill Burgess, the director of the Assistive Technology lab at Middle Tennessee University, agrees with president Marc Maurer of the NFB, when he states “effective technology …empower(s) the individual user of that technology. Invaluable assistive tools allow the user to “compete effectively in this world and…(achieve) quality in life,” (Monitor, 2004). I truly respect and appreciate Bill’s expertise and sincere desire to empower his clients to successful endeavors. Assistive technology “connects (the disabled) and levels the playing field.” Burgess expressed that technology will continue to advance, becoming “simpler to use… and more ubiquitous, providing universal access (for everyone),” (personal communication, February 16th, 2014). What progress is being made today in education for the disabled.
A bill that will be introduced this year is called the TEACH Act (Technology, Education, and Accessibility in College and Higher Education). Presently, educational institutions provide materials in an accessible format only when requested. The TEACH Act would require that from the get-go, all materials would be accessible and readily available to all students. James Brown, State President of the Tennessee NFB Affiliate, commented, “It is so important for blind students around Tennessee to have equal access to education,” (personal communication, February 18th, 2014). Legislation such as the TEACH Act paves the way for other states to follow and will benefit students of all disabilities. Yes, a bright future accomplished by the hard work of education and advocacy.
The film “History’s” narrator stated that “in the 1950’s and 60’s, while blacks were trying to get in the front of the bus, the disabled were just trying to get on the bus,” (A Little History). Changing the minds and educating the world has had its challenges. Yet today, many have been educated and have a more accurate understanding of the disabled’s capabilities. There is still more work to do!
True, today there have been numerous attempts to extinguish the flame of advocacy among the disabled. Nevertheless, that fire has not gone out! The raging, scorching fire of equality burning deep inside every disabled person has continued to spread like an uncontained forest fire, moving at the pace of a steam powered train roaring to its destination! This destination is a place called ‘equality.” A destination with a capital named “The metropolis Free of Stereotypes, where all its citizens enjoy fulfilling lives of equality and fulfillment.” Through organizations, such as the NFB, our communities are being educated. Persons such as Bill Burgess train the disabled in the progression of technology and independence. Thus, the disabled, well equipped and educated, have proven that they can compete shoulder to shoulder among “normal” man. Examples have shown that with the proper gaining, education , technology, and the lack of hindrance of stereotypes, the disabled flourish, living successful and meaningful lives. William Butler Yates, a famous author is quoted as saying “education is not the filling of the pail, but the lighting the fire.” So may that flame never die!

The Definition of “Disability”

Martina Navratilova, a well-known poet once said “disability is a matter of perception. How an accurate statement that is! When many hear the word disability, they may think of someone with Down syndrome, a person in a wheelchair, or one who is blind. A person who has limited function physically or mentally is referred to as disabled. Kris Boehm, my father, defines disability as a person who has difficulty with a particular task. My thoughts reflected such a viewpoint as well. Do I continue to have such an perspective?
In 2010, I lost my sight due to an attempted suicide. I only knew of one other blind individual, so I was unaware of what my future held out for me. Would I be able to pursue the same goals and live an active life as before? Would I be able to partake in the same hobbies activities as before? Initially, I thought not. How can a person with no vision live an independant and fruitful life?
My self-determination and positive attitude aided me in seeking out the education and tools that are available to the blind. I came into contact with other fine examples of blind individuals who did not let their lack of vision hinder them from pursuing meaningful and fulfilling lives.Thus, I feel that just because a person may have a limitation, whether it be physical or mental, with the proper training and education, such characteristics that appear to be a disability are no disability at all! For instance, blindness may be preconceived as a limitation, yet being vision impaired can be easily overcome with technology, education, and the right mindset.
A disability is something that limits you from performing a certain task. Hence, if you have the right training and education and you have learned to perform the same tasks you used to, just differently, how is that a disability? Can a person without an obvious impairment be considered disabled? Imagine a six foot six inches tall man trying to fit in a Mini Cooper. Such a tall person may not be able to fit comfortably in such a vehicle or have the ability to drive the coupe. Could he not be considered disabled by circumstance? I believe so. Therefore, if your physical impairment does not limit or hinder you in your daily activities, is it a disability? I believe not.
I have met doctors, chemists, teachers, golfers, Olympians, and business owners that are blind but “see” no limits as to what they set their mind on. I had the pleasure of meeting Mark Rickobono, the first blind man to drive a self-driving car, hitting speeds up to 43 mph in his first drive! Such examples motivate and reaffirm the notion that the only thing that will hinder me is myself.
Do others perceive the disabled as capable individuals? Unfortunately no! Due to ignorance and the inconsistencies from the media, the majority feel that those with disabilities are helpless and inferior. The disabled have advocated for themselves to legislate for equality in today’s world. For instance, in the United States, an outdated law entitled Section 14C of the Fair Labor Standards Act, discriminates against those who are disabled; the 1938 act allows companies to apply for certificates in order to pay disabled individuals pennies on the dollar, far lower than the minimum wage. In fact, businesses such as Goodwill pay their disabled employees as low as 12 cents an hour- and it’s legal! These same employers have multi-million dollar owners and managers that exploit the provisions of the Fair Wages Act. They even receive tax deductions, government cutbacks, and other incentives that find their way into their own pockets. Organizations, such as the National Federation of the Blind and the American Foundation of the Blind, are working hard to legislate and repeal these unjust standards.
Often, parents and families of disabled children, due to being unaware of the availability of training and sources within hands reach, shelter their child so much that the child feels as if someone has to do everything for them. Such a person’s communication and interaction skills with others suffer due to their sheltered environment. This presents a challenge, but not a challenge that cannot be overcome with the proper training and education.
How does language influence how we view people with disabilities? The misconceptions and attitudes towards the abilities of disabled persons reflect onto the vocabulary and expressions used today. We may subconsciously discriminate against one with a perceived disability. Thus, such language transfers to the conscious mind, affecting our interpretations and opinions. The inaccurate belief that the disabled are not capable of overcoming their ailment highlights the need for further education and advocacy.
So are all ideas of disabilities accurate? No! Even though we live in 2014, much more effort and work is needed to educate the world about disabilities. Organizations, such as the National Federation of the Blind and the American Council of the Blind, lead the front to change what it means to be blind in the eyes of those blinded by false assumptions. Many blind have more vision than a sighted individual; numerous paralyzed persons in wheelchairs have walked through trials and tribulations triumphantly to live happy and satisfying lives! Technology has aided many to accomplish tasks that the everyday person would think be impossible. We disable ourselves only if we limit ourselves in our thinking! I asked my father, since having a son who recently lost his vision, has his thoughts on disabilities changed? He replied, “Yes… At first I thought we would become caretakers…but my viewpoint now is that perhaps the disability for many is their perception of how a person can adapt in order to be a whole person. Given the right opportunity and motivation we all can overcome anything others perceive as a disability… My son has proven that to me.”
So, what are your perceptions in referring to the disabled? Never be “handicapped” by preconceived notions!

A way With words- Article on TexTexting

By James Boehm“
Article in response to “To be or Not To Be” by David Crystal
The Guardian,
2b or not 2b?”: That Presents a Question
A man tells his wife, “When I look at your face, time stands still. Another man tells his
ex-wife to be, “You have a face that could stop a clock.” Both men are saying the same thing. Yet, notice the striking difference in connotation. Now, consider this: You text your mom “Did you not receive the package I sent you?” She replies, “Yes.” Initially, you accept her reply. But then you begin pondering, “Wait a minute, is Mom meaning “Yes, I got the package,” or “Yes, I did not receive the package?” Why different connotations? Such examples prove that meaning is determined at times not by what one says, but how one says it.
Thus, we come to the subject of text messaging. The majority of readers will agree, especially now into the 21st century, that texting has advantages and is commonplace. However, there is a downside in utilizing such a form of communication. The texting population experiences first-hand daily the imperfections of mass communication in one form or another. What views have some expressed in regard to such interaction?
One such view is in “2b or Not 2b, where” David Crystal addresses texting and relates the modern form of messaging to centuries of communication among humankind in its various forms.. Crystal relates how puzzles of old and many words that we use today are actually born from larger words. He comments that some play the “blame game” on texting in reference to poor grammar and writing among the current generation. One reference accused mass messaging of messing up the English language. In a change of scenery, Crystal gives kudos to modern-day messaging as he points to the reasoning that kids must have a higher form of intellectual English to text. High levels of creativity are needed to convey a thought in a shortened version. “2b or not 2b” leaves a spread of both sides of the bread, as it were, giving the reader points to ponder. While “2b or Not 2b?” is quite informative, Crystal fails to address what’s lost in communication when texting; furthermore, Crystal’s argument also neglects the dangers of texting.

Crystal cites the reader’s perceptions and others comments on “SMSing,” which stands for short message service, The research done on the history of abbreviations and short-handed writing was impressive and informative. Crystal states, “Just a little over ten years ago, hardly anyone had ever heard of ‘texting.’” (Crystal 336). This statement is truly accurate; you can see even today, only four years since this article was written, that mass messaging has grown leaps and bounds. Even the use of the “emoji” keyboard, keyboard providing characters of facial expressions and art, permeates the messaging world. Likewise, in the Braille writing system that blind persons use, there are 189 abbreviations and contractions. Texting is such a coveted technology today that even the blind community wants to participate, that as of February 7, 2013, new software was released that replicated the braille keyboard so that users may braille to text other smart phone users.Such an application is interesting because the keys on a Braille writer, in comparison to an “Qwerty” keyboard that sighted people are accustomed to, has only six keys and a central spacebar.

Today, you see people as well who you may have never thought would begin texting are participants- such as my mother who now does on a daily basis as she surprises me with SMS jargon and abbreviations that I myself am uncertain of their meaning. At times I have to Google what she sends me to find out its meaning! Hence, from my own mother, to the silver haired grandma who lives down your street, more and more of the population participate in text messaging their friends and family. Next thing you will know, I will find my guide dog Shep shooting out a text message to his other guide dog buddy. How he will do this without opposable thumbs, I am not positive, but I am sure Apple well eventually make an app for that! Further, if Crystal has his way, such a future situation will be bound to occur. But consider this: Just because mom,grandma, down the street and a large population partake in this latest technological fad, should we automatically presume texting as the acceptable and preferred way of communication?
No it should not! History has produced many fine examples where the common idea and acceptable way of thinking is not always the best, appropriate, and understanding. For instance, some ancient eastern cultures held the belief that the Earth was supported on the back of turtle, serpent, or elephant. Eventually, these myths were put to rest with growing knowledge of earth science and astronomy. Crystal indeed has a “World Turtle” view of modern day messaging by claiming its popularity gives it validation.
Yet, regardless of how informative Crystal’s texting debate is, it’s ultimately ineffective if it can’t be understood. In addition, the flow of the essay leaves the reader somewhat confused as to the writer’s position and is at times as clouded as an abbreviated text with unclear meaning. It is not until you meditate upon completing the reading before you begin to grasp Crystal’s viewpoint. Such a stand could have been portrayed clearer. How often have you texted someone and the receiver depicted a complete different mood or meaning than you were attempting to portray? This scenario is common place and a major flaw. Furthermore, more could have been stressed on the meaning that is strained as it flows from your finger tips to the colander texting device.
The “2b or not 2b” essay uses the word “evolution” (Crystal 345). It refers to the advancement of the human age in relation to texting. Yet, when we consider the numerous weaknesses of texting can we seriously consider it an advancement? Or, can we consider it laziness and poor attention to detail? When you look at a common text message, the omission of punctuation, spelling, and proper grammar etiquette is prevalent. Further, can texting be a symbol portraying our modern day philosophy of never stopping to smell the roses? Do we really accomplish any more than our ancestors of old? With all our modern day conveniences, how can we still feel there is not enough time in the day?
There is no denial that abbreviating has been a pastime from the beginning of the concept of writing to communicate. Nevertheless, the issue of portraying a clear and concise message, free from misinterpretation, is evident, which is simply the nature of the beast. Consider a common day example: You text your girlfriend or boyfriend after you know that she or he has had a stressful day, “Are you feeling alright?” He or she simply replies, “Yes.” You begin to ponder what she really meant. Could her reply be taken with various meanings? Yes! Furthermore, just the slight mishap of not capitalizing a letter can change the understanding of a sentence completely. Consider the two: I helped my Uncle Jack off the horse. I helped my uncle jack off the horse. Truly an innocent misreading can have a tremendous effect on our desired meaning. True, the majority of comon people own a smart phone and find text messaging convenient;sadly, mss’s convenience often transforms into inconvenience.How more nice would it be to limit your use of the “relationship killer” and just hit the send button! Clearly, texting is far from a “linguistic phenomenon!” (Crystal 345). “2b or not 2b?” significantly brings meaning into question and has a face that could stop a clock!

My article: A Blind Eye to Equality

Turning a Blind Eye to Inequality
Written by James Boehm
Your boss just handed you a check for a weeks worth of work. The payment reflects a week worth of work consisting of an eight to five time frame. As you glance down at the the piece of paper, looking at the total amount, you notice a minute total of $1.35. You rub your eyes to ensure that your vision is not playing tricks on you. As you verify with the calendar to your left, you verify that, yes, it is the year 2013, not 1803. How is this possible? Can such a form of recompense for services rendered be justified legally?
Now consider this: You have just become a proud parent of a beautiful baby girl! The newborn portrays a perfect balance of her parent’s features. What a proud moment in a new parent’s life! You hold your new addition to your family and observe this little one, who at first sight of his new parents, presents a smile of contentment. Soon, the nurses proceed to take the child from the delivery room and prepare the child for the nursery. You did not know as the physicians file out of the room, this will be the last time you would see your child for quite some time. In fact, later on you are notified that you are not perceived to be a capable parent, and thus the child has been put in the care of a stranger rather than you. What an indescribable feeling that words of pain and sorrow cannot even begin to portray!
No one would think, especially now in our advanced and civilized society, would such circumstances occur. Yet such occurrences are experienced by individuals with visual impairments so frequently it terrifies even the most courageous. Blindness should not be a factor in determining if a person is capable of raising a child. Such issues arise due to the misconceptions of abilities of the blind. When considering the qualifications for employment or parenthood, blindness should not be a determining factor.
There have been many advances in education and laws that uphold the unalienable rights of the blind and disabled. It was not until the second half of the twentieth century that attention was brought to the protection of rights of the blind in various aspects. In 1990, the statutes of the ADA, the Americans with Disabilities Act, outlined numerous regulations on healthcare, accessibility in transit, public education, housing, and labor, to name a few. While there have been many strides towards equality, the common discrimination brings to light the need to educate the public that there is still a lot of work to do. Many organizations, including the NFB, National Federation of the Blind,The American Council for the Blind (ACB), and The American Foundation of the Blind (AFB), actively take part in education, training, and legislation for the visually impaired. Likewise, these organizations educate the public on the misconceptions of blindness. History and numerous examples have shown that people who are blind, with the proper training, education, and tools, can competitively work along side the sighted public.
The blind have the right to receive fair and competitive wages in their employment. Sub-minimum wages are being paid to blind and disabled persons in the work force. According to the Braille Monitor, a 78 year old provision called the Fair Labor Standards Act, permits United States companies to receive certificates from the government when the company has hired a blind or disabled person (Danielson). With such a certificate, a person can be paid sub-minimum wages. Companies like Goodwill advertise and boast about their hiring of disabled workers. Nevertheless, these same companies have been documented as paying absurdly low hourly rates. “…Goodwill affiliates operate manufacturing operations that employ people with disabilities under special wage certificates at wages as low as 22 cents per hour…” (Danielson). Organizations, such as the National Federation of the Blind, and American Council of the Blind, protest against and boycott such companies, exposing the companies’ inequitable standards. In the aforementioned article, director of public relations for the National Federation of the Blind, states, “Don’t donate to or purchase goods from Goodwill until it adopts a responsible corporate policy to pay its works with disabilities at least the federal minimum wage Current legislation is in the works to amend the ADA so companies will no longer take advantage of the laws that actually were set forth to protect the disabled. The discriminating employers argue that changes to current legislation would create a financial hardship , causing them to either to shut down or terminate employees. Such idiotic reasoning is attempting to frame the employers as victims. How can employers consider themselves victims when the revenue they collect is beyond the income derived from the actual productivity of the worker who is disabled? Such companies that give the perception that they are helping the disabled community receive tax benefits, public funding, donations, preferred contracts before one of their employees even step foot into the factory. In contrast, such justification exposes the perverse exploitation the existing provisions authorized by the Fair Wages Act.
Now, another misconception that negatively affects the blind community is in parenting. Blindness should not be a determining factor in establishing if a person is capable of raising a child. According to The Huffington Post, in 2012, parents with disabilities “continue to be the only distinct community has to fight to retain and sometimes gain custody of their own children” (Crary). A Time Magazine article entitled “Rocking the Cradle- Ensuring the Rights of Parents,” notes that parents with disabilities face discrimination when the welfare of a child or family law, becomes an issue as well as adoption (Rochman). In 1990, The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed by Congress, implemented to protect parents with disabilities. Yet, the ADA at times has fallen short, pushing visually impaired parents into legal quicksand. Two thirds of state child welfare law list some type of disability as grounds for removing a child from the confines of a parents care and terminating the parental rights.
In a March 2010 ABC news report, a young blind family had just given birth to a lovely baby boy, but were dumb founded to find out that they could no longer have their child, could not hold the newborn, and would have to agree to supervised visits in order to see their son throughout the week (James). The NFB eagerly and rightfully brought suit against the hospital and child welfare services. The federation was successful in the legal battle, bringing an end to the discriminatory misconceptions expressed towards the capable, blind young family. One of the parents, Erika Johnson, stated after the ordeal, “We’re visually impaired, not mentally impaired. And you know we’re just like everybody else, we just can’t see as well. (James)
Luci Alexander, a blind parent of two children under the age of 10, and the director for blind services in New Mexico, stated in March of 2013 that “blind parents perform the same duties of caring for a child.” Blind parents can execute necessary tasks for their children auditory just as well as those who do those same activities visually. A visually impaired parent can tell by sound distinctions if a child has a baby bottle in their hand or toy, to see if the child has acquired an item it should not have. Likewise, no matter if a parent is sighted or not, a child can pick up things off the floor or get into mischief. The point is the parent has to be observant and mindful of the child’s behavior. Disability rights lawyer Robyn Powell comments on this in the Huffington Post article previously mentioned saying, “Of course there are going to be some parents with disabilities who would be lousy parents – that’s the same with parents without disabilities” (Crary). Obviously, orderliness, preparation, and a conscientious effort to have a safe home environment is necessary, and all of this can be done quite effectively by the unsighted.
In conclusion, today’s misconceptions of blindness cause inequalities in regards to fair wages and employment and the rights of parents. Those who place stereotypes are blinder than the blind themselves. The misconception is if you do not have sight, you do not have the capacity. What people fail to realize is that blind people develop alternate ways of performing day-to-day tasks. Thus, the blind have demonstrated effectiveness and the ability to be beneficiaries of fair wages, employment, as well as not allowing their blindness be a determining factor of if they are a capable parent. Blindness misconceptions must be addressed further because the blind community is growing. According to Tina Lubarsky, an advocate for the ACB and a physical therapist, “Diabetic rhetanopothy is the leading cause for blindness today, affecting thirty percent of people with diabetes.” In an article “Don’t Blame the Eater, , David Zinzinko stated, “by 2050, one in three adults will suffer form type two diabetes.” If such trends continue, this means that one ninth of the population will suffer from diabetic retanopothy or some form of blindness. Urgency is needed to educate the public regarding the many misconceptions of blindness, and that further legislation is needed to protect and uphold the equality of all persons regardless of gender, disability, race, etc. Likewise, blindness should not be a factor when determining employment, fair wages, or distinguishing the capability of a potential parent. The exploitation of the disabled as a resource for charity revenue and fundraising must come to an end! Next time you get your paycheck, remember that the visually impaired are just as capable and deserve the same treatment in all of life’s aspects including in employment and parenthood.

Charger the Size of a Tube of Lip Stick On Sale On Amazon Until August 21st.

At the worst of times, our powered devices’ battery life fails us. I came across this nifty little charger that is the size of a tube of lip stick. You can purchase it on Amazon at a discounted price until the end of August 2013. Check out the link below for more information. The device will work on your I phone, Ipod, Ipad, and other devices. The I phone can be charged over 2 times with this device! Try to die on me now Mr Battery!
http://appadvice.com/appnn/2013/08/anker-is-offering-a-great-deal-on-its-astro-mini-external-battery

Seeing Eye Guide Dog User Denied Access to Cab Services

Woman says cab driver refused her a ride because of seeing-eye dog
By Bob Heye KATU News and KATU.com Staff Published: Aug 2, 2013 at 12:40 AM PDT Last Updated: Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM PDT

267 Comments
Print
Email
»PLAY VIDEO
Deb Marinos says a Broadway Cab driver refused to give her a ride because she had a seeing-eye dog.
PORTLAND, Ore. – A woman who is blind says a Broadway Cab driver refused her service because she had a seeing-eye dog with her.

It all unfolded at Union Station, and an Amtrak worker confirmed what happened to Deb Marinos.

Marinos had gotten off the train and was trying to get to OHSU for a scheduled checkup but a Broadway Cab driver, and then a second cab driver both refused to give her a ride.

“I have a little tiny bit of vision,” she said. “I’m what’s called legally blind, but I have no peripheral vision. So the dog provides me the ability to cross streets and find curbs and doors.”

Marinos rides Amtrak all the time – commuting to work in Salem and Portland and also traveling the country to conferences and legislative assemblies in her job as a vocational rehabilitation counselor for the Oregon Council of the Blind.

She was stunned when she went to get into a Broadway Cab and the driver refused to let her in.

“And he says, ‘No, she has a dog. I’m not takin’ her. No dogs. Dogs aren’t allowed by the company.'”

A second Broadway driver said he’d take her, but he already had a fare. The next cab back was a Sassy Cab, a subsidiary of Broadway Cab.

“The cab behind him, Sassy Cab, says ‘No, I don’t do dogs either,'” Marinos said. “And then the fourth cab got out to see what all the fun was about and they said, ‘OK, we’ll take you.'”

An Amtrak helper known as Red Cap argued with the cab drivers’ refusals.

“Amtrak is so incredibly good at taking care of us, and the Red Cap today was just absolutely. He was just like all over them and could not believe it – that they’d never had that before where they’ve had someone turned down,” Marinos said.

And if you think allergies to dogs is behind all this, Marinos said that’s not a factor. She’s allergic to dogs. Her service dog breed is hypoallergenic.

KATU didn’t get a response from Broadway Cab Thursday night. City regulations say “No driver shall … refuse to transport to his requested destination any passenger of proper demeanor who is able to demonstrate the ability to pay the fare.”

Marinos met both of those requirements.

A city spokesperson said the city is starting a formal investigation into the incident and that Broadway Cab is cooperating with investigators.